If we’re not aware of the strength of our context, this can push us to behave outside our principles. The study is very low in ethical principles.
Many participants experienced trembling, stuttering and nervous laughter; three unfortunate people … They found out — with disturbing … If the participants were told that they were responsible, it is possible that Milgram would have obtained very different results. Explanations .

He Milgram experiment Were a series of tests that served ... After the experiments, Milgram created a documentary film in which he demonstrated the experiment and the results obtained. They were done by Stanley Milgram in the 1960s. Opponents of the ethics of Milgram’s experiment believe that the amount of stress caused by the experiment deems it unethical (Controversy: Ethics in Experiments). Milgram wanted to find out if people would follow orders, even if the orders went against their conscience. Although the participants were given the right to withdraw, they certainly were not made fully aware of it. The Milgram Experiment shows us an example of the strength of the situation that Zimbardo (2012) talks about. The Milgram experiment is the name for a number of controversial experiments in psychology. Milgram’s study has been criticised for lacking ecological validity. The Milgram experiment sought to find out how easily the average person could be induced to commit heinous crimes under orders. Today it is almost impossible to find one of these copies. He proved they would.

Milgram (1963) Evaluation – Ethics – the study is one of the most infamous studies in Psychology’s history, because of it’s ethics. This is the explanation that was favoured by Milgram because he was a social psychologist.
The Milgram experiment(s) on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram.They measured the willingness of study participants, men from a diverse range of occupations with varying levels of education, to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience.

Furthermore, he did debrief his participants following the experiment and 83.7% of participants said that they were happy to have taken part in the experiment and contribute to scientific research.

There have been many repetitions and variations, with similar results. In Milgram’s original experiment, the participants were told that the experimenter had full responsibility and therefore they could act as an agent, carrying out the experimenter’s orders.